The Flaming Vegan

A Vegan and Vegetarian Blogging Extravaganza

The Vegan Solution to the Politics of Breast Cancer
Facebook Tweet Google+ Pinterest Email More Sharing Options

The Vegan Solution to the Politics of Breast Cancer

There is a pernicious disease which runs through the consciousness of women today. This disease is not just breast cancer, it is gullibility and lack of information. This disease of misinformation has a very strong hold on our society.

In the 1940s, one in twenty two women had a risk of getting breast cancer. As of 2011, it is one in eight. Each year, 59,000 women die from breast cancer in the United States alone and women are lead to believe that "Running For The Cure" fundraising is the solution to their disease. The Pink Ribbon campaigns brainwash women into helpless victims who believe that some cure, eventually, will be found if only they bond with their sisters around the world, get a mammogram and donate money to "research".

Of course positive support is important but not as important as uncovering the truth about cancer. The truth is kept willfully hidden from women who seek help with the industrial medical system.

"Running For The Cure" events are a giant marketing party for corporations like Yoplait, Balance, Honest Tea, and many others for selling their products. It is in fact shameful that events which are supposed to promote Cancer awareness bring companies whose products are in fact hurting women (and men). If there was real honesty in the cancer industry, no one would tell women to eat animal products, particularly bovine secretions which are in fact linked to breast cancer. Walk for cure events are also sponsored by Avon, Revlon and Estee Lauder, companies which sell products with carcinogenic chemicals. Yoplait "donates" smoothies to runners containing cancer causing bovine milk or asks people to send their Yoplait container lids "for the cure". They promote a product as healthy when it is in fact hurting people. It is also disturbing to witness Kentucky Fried Chicken doing its own pink advertising while promoting products of diseases and suffering. The Susan G. Komen foundation has donated up to 1.9 billion dollars to so-called "research" (as of 2011), which goes to fund the useless torture of non-human animals.

The message that is spread to women is the patriarchal message that women's bodies are the problem and that we don't know what causes breast cancer. How on Earth do doctors pretend to find a cure to something who they say has no known cause?

In the name of raising money for breast cancer, you can now buy pink guns (not kidding), "pink pony polo's shirts" from Ralph Lauren (not kidding again) and many other things which directly exploit the fears of women and their vulnerability. Breast cancer "research" is about greed and exploitation and they sell the disease in pretty wrapped pink ribbons to make it appealing. The brainwashing of women is so deep that, whenever I tried to give my version of this to women in the past, I was called monster, or uncaring. "How dare I even say something bad about Breast cancer awareness?!"

Well done cancer industry, you've done a beautiful marketing job of keeping women ignorant while you make billions on their health. These awareness campaigns are so powerful that they even reached the virtual 3D world of Second Life where they convince thousands of people to give their virtual money for the "cause". If you're not familiar with this concept, virtual money can be exchanged for real life dollars on Second Life and other virtual worlds and they raise thousands of dollars.

As a feminist and Vegan, I consider these Pink Ribbons campaigns deeply insulting and degrading. Their only benefit is to lift up women psychologically but that is lying to them about the usefulness of their participation in this industry. The marketing of breast cancer is in fact so successful that, otherwise intelligent, women like Angelina Jolie go as far as getting their breasts removed for fear that they might be at risk of breast cancer because the male dominated cancer industry says so. It is ironic, however, that no one advises men to get their prostates removed as a preventive measure even though prostate cancer is as wide-spread for men as is breast cancer for women. And both cancer types are easily preventable. Of course, in a sexist society, worrying about women's breasts is more attractive than men's prostates, hence the posters of naked women holding their breasts. It is therefore accepted as normal and necessary to mutilate women but no one is suggesting doing the same to men.

For centuries, women's wisdom about their bodies has been suppressed by the male dominated medicine. As John Robbins documented in his excellent book "Reclaiming Our Health", male medicine has done everything it could to suppress women's knowledge of natural cures and practices. This included taking over the midwives' ancestral work of birthing, something always done by women, by spreading lies about their supposed witchery or the supposed dangers to babies (lies of course) so that men could take over and control women's bodies in their male-controlled hospitals instead of the woman's home. Then it continued on in the Victorian era with male doctors treating women as hysterical beings (hence the word hysterectomy) if they didn't "behave properly" with their husbands.

To this day, patriarchal medicine sees women as unbalanced emotional beings as well as potential patients for everything from PMS to birth. And let's not forget the attacks on women's reproductive rights and control over their own bodies. Breast cancer research is a pure by-product of this mentality and, instead of being about prevention, it is about profit and taking advantage of women's fears and compassion.

We now know that breast cancer is preventable with the right nutrition and the right lifestyle. A whole foods Vegan lifestyle and the use of animal free and eco-friendly (chemical free) personal care products are the best ways to prevent breast cancer because dairy products and mainstream personal care products are linked to the development of this disease. Our environmental pollution is also a big factor but lifestyle helps determine if genes get turned on or off and can in fact help prevent the action of environmental pollutants. Another lie debunked is that mammograms are not preventing cancer and are in fact dangerous.

With its usual patronizing approach, modern medicine is of the opinion that women are not willing to change their diets, that it is, in the words of Dr. John McDougall, "too much to ask" and let's face it: diet recommendations don't make doctors rich. Angelina Jolie's double mastectomy made someone $50,000. Chemotherapy and radiation are a multi-billion dollar business and "treating" women with it generates a lot of money in a profit-driven industry. So, modern medicine, in its patriarchal capitalistic thinking, is not going to give women the option that is not profitable because it doesn't have an incentive to do so.

Prevention should be the key but, according to Janet Collins, the organizer of the first Cancer Conference on Breast Cancer in Kingston, Ontario in 1997, less than 5% of the millions that go to "research" are for prevention. Charlotte Haley created the first Ribbon to make people aware that prevention was only 5% of all the funds used, not to start the campaigns we have today which don't address this at all. Her idea was stolen by Self Magazine and Estee Lauder who wanted to capitalize on the ribbon idea for their bottom line. Charlotte refused to get involved and they had to come up with a new color for the ribbon to be able to exploit her idea legally. It is nothing short of criminal.

It is ironic that women eat and drink the products of females from other species and are not taught the link between their (indirect) oppression of female animals and their own oppression at the hands of the cancer industry. They not only fail to realize that they imprison themselves by supporting the imprisonment of other animals, but they also reinforce the dominant mentality.

If we look at what treatments are available to women, it is nothing but cut, burn and destroy. It is the same thinking which cuts, burns and destroys other animals or cuts, burns and destroys forests and oceans. That same patriarchal mentality is at the heart of everything that is wrong with modern medicine (and our world). In the 1940s, it started with turning women into "warriors against cancer", a very masculine notion indeed and the "war on cancer" still predominates the discussion.

The industry, including some of their backers like The Weston Price Foundation, have also demonized soy products instead of telling women that eating soy products in fact helps prevent breast cancer when started young. In Asia, where soy consumption is very high, the instances of breast cancer are very low.

As Dr. Joel Fuhrman explains in his book "Super Immunity": "It is now clear that soy intake during adolescence, a time when breast tissue is most sensitive to environmental stimuli and carcinogenesis, may reduce the risk of breast cancer later in life. Recent articles in Cancer Epidemiology and The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition reported that soy consumption during childhood and teenage years reduced the risk of breast cancer in adulthood by 60 percent and 40 percent, respectively.

Soybeans are rich in isoflavones, a type of phytoestrogen. Phytoestrogens are plant substances that are chemically similar to estrogen - and since higher estrogen levels promote breast cancer, some people predicted that soy would too. Now we know that the phytoestrogens in soy actually block the effects of the body's estrogen. Despite myths propagated on the Internet, the most recent and reliable clinical studies support a strong protective effect of minimally processed soy foods against breast cancer."

Instead of the clear cut masculine approach, why not a natural feminine approach to Breast Cancer? As Dr. Joel Fuhrman also reported in his book: "In one recent study, women who ate at least 10 grams of fresh mushrooms each day (equivalent to just one small mushroom) had a 64 percent decreased risk of breast cancer. Even more dramatic protection was gained by women who ate 10 grams of mushrooms and consumed green compounds from green tea daily - an 80 percent decrease in risk for premenopausal women and 82 percent for postmenopausal women. Similar associations were observed in studies on stomach and colorectal cancers. Hard to be believe, isn't it? Why doesn't every (emphasis in the text) woman know the protective effects that mushrooms have against breast cancer?"

Why indeed? Because telling women to eliminate animal products and eat vegetables doesn't make the male dominated cancer industry rich.

If women really want to, not just save their breasts, but also help their sisters avoid losing theirs, they need to recognize the link between their consumption of products of suffering which oppresses non-human females and their own oppression at a system which denies them the wisdom and intelligence to heal their own bodies. Until then, unless they make the connections, a lot of them will sadly continue to lose their breasts and their lives. Change will be nothing short of a rejection of the dominant thinking and a return to old wisdom of compassion to themselves and other animals. In connecting these dots, they will then heal.

Sources: For more information, I recommend you see the documentary "Pink Ribbons" which is watchable instantly on Netflix. The documentary has some good information but, unfortunately, typically fails to recognize any link between diet and disease and instead focuses on environmental factors like chemicals. But it is, however, very informative as far as the business of breast cancer is concerned. Thank you so much to my friend Debbie G. Malek for pointing out this documentary to me.

Other sources for this article:




Veronique Perrot, H.C. is a AADP Certified Holistic Vegan Health Coach located in Los Angeles. She teaches nutrition and well being and has also a Certification In Plant Based Diets from Cornell University and a World Peace Diet Certification through Dr. Will Tuttle's World Peace Diet program. You can get in contact with her at She produces a free newsletter each months with tips, recipes and information on healthy plant based living. She believes in the abolition of all animal exploitation and has helped people to transition to the vegan lifestyle in an ethical and healthy way. Also visit her blog The Vegan Communicator for good vegan ethics. 



*Image courtesy Flickr creative commons.

Healthy Snacks Delivered Monthly
  1. tara
    Hello Veronique! Thank you for such a thorough and honest look at breast cancer. I absolutely love this: ... here is a pernicious disease which runs through the consciousness of women today. This disease is not just breast cancer, it is gullibility and lack of information. This disease of misinformation has a very strong hold on our society... So true, we must do our own research and make our own connections and decisions. It is very sad that at such a vulnerable time and in such a (seemingly) vulnerable place; women are given the advice to cut, burn, destroy. And the really sad news is that often that only worsens the overall health and spreads the cancer. Some will point to successes and survival rates, and this is wonderful. However if the core causes (and there are causes) are not removed then the disease will return again either there or somewhere else. I also wonder why our sexual organs are targeted by cancer. Could we maybe clean up our thoughts and projections towards others in this area?
    1. Veronique Perrot
      Veronique Perrot
      Thank you for your kind comments Tara. I like your last point. I think cleaning is in order.
  2. RobbVegan
    Thank you for this, Veronique! As I have told you personally, my wife had a form of uterine cancer (endometrial sarcoma); when she died five and a half years ago, she had been a vegan for ten years. There is ample evidence that a whole food plant-based (vegan) diet has the power to prevent and even reverse many diseases, however sometimes even vegans get cancer and in my wife's case I believe that her years working in nuclear power plant labs were a factor. I also now fear that the very aggressive chemotherapy she endured did more harm than good. The oncologist we first consulted was a pompous jerk. The one we switched to was personable and took time to listen to my wife and he seemed genuinely caring. But, as my wife's cancer was rather rare, he had to rely on treatments that he found to be successful with breast cancer and when those failed he switched to chemo that was so intense Kendra had to remain in the hospital for a week during each round. Even though we both trusted her doctor and we were willing to do anything to stop the cancer, Kendra was not content to leave her fate solely in his hands. She took it upon herself to learn as much as she could about how diet could help. And so she adopted a completely raw (vegan, of course) diet and eliminated sugar. Though it did not stop her cancer from spreading, I believe if it weren’t for maintaining such a diet, Kendra would not have been able to withstand the ordeals she underwent. Three months before she died Kendra was in full vigor as we hiked in Yosemite. A month before she died, we took part in the EIF Revlon Run Walk at the invitation of a friend. We had heard that Revlon no longer tested their cosmetics on animals and we felt that that, naively, made it okay. I proudly wore a vegan tee shirt during the walk! But we were both appalled by the corporate aspect of the whole thing. It was only later that I learned what a profit driven disgrace these things are! Your article has given me even more of a perspective and made me ashamed of supporting such a sham. Understand though that both Kendra and I believed in keeping hope alive and were willing to hold onto anything that gave us some. I know, Veronique, that you, also, are committed to hope and even though, as you know, I have my darker moments, I believe that is essential and I honor you for maintaining hope --and fighting the good fight!
    1. Veronique Perrot
      Veronique Perrot
      Thank you so much for your deeply felt, heart warming and touching comments Robb. Kendra's story is sadly such a tragic example of the arrogance of the medical industry. How you describe her initial "doctor" is what I have encountered over the years and what made me, in part, leave the medical industry professionally (I worked for a Clinical Psychologist and a M.D in Los Angeles, one at the Sedar Sinai many years ago). The first words of the day, in each office, were "how much do I get paid today?". I will never forget this poor woman who was in terrible pain walking into a room with me so I could take her medical history. I tried to rush the damn thing because she suffered and no one seemed to care. I asked later why no one seemed to worry that someone, with tons of tubes going inside her body, should have to sit through a 10-15 mns medical history (which they already had heard many times) instead of getting actual help. I just got blank stares and a total disinterest from the people working there. That is sadly what the medical industry has become. In a for profit system, we can't have any actual healing, we can only have management of disease and a medical mentality which refuses to consider anything than their accepted "treatments" (which of course are the ones profitable). It is truly important to keep the hope alive as you said. When my grand-mother was diagnosed with lung cancer when I was a teenager, my aunt put her on a raw diet (although it included raw meat) and she got a lot better and more energy. She followed us on vacation in the Alps. Unfortunately, it was too widespread and she passed away not long after but with no suffering. Yes a whole foods plant based diet is the best step we can take. But it is not 100% successful because we usually don't know how long a cancer has been around. Dr. McDougall, for instance, did a great video on Steve Job's cancer and explained that he in fact lived a lot longer than he should have thanks to his vegan diet. According to him, he was likely carrying cancer since his early days building computers (when he was a teenager). I highly recommend this lecture. Once again, thank you so much for your wonderful comments which are deeply touching.


Connect with The Flaming Vegan

Sign Up to Vote!

10 second sign-up with Facebook or Google

Already a member? Log in to vote.